April 9, 2017 - The Privy Council

The Oath of the Members of the Privy Council:

I, [name], do solemnly and sincerely swear (or declare) that I shall be a true and faithful servant to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, as a member of Her Majesty’s Privy Council for Canada. I will in all things to be treated, debated and resolved in Privy Council, faithfully, honestly and truly declare my mind and my opinion. I shall keep secret all matters committed and revealed to me in this capacity, or that shall be secretly treated of in Council. Generally, in all things I shall do as a faithful and true servant ought to do for Her Majesty.

Who is this Privy Council, what do they do, and why are they forced, by oath, to keep secrets from us?

Information can be found on the website for the Privy Council Office (PCO).

"PCO is the hub of non-partisan, public service support to the Prime Minister and Cabinet and its decision-making structures."

They are a group of people selected—not elected—to work for and benefit the British Monarcy. Does that suit you?

Remember, this decision-making affects the Canadian people—their rights, their freedoms, and their property. As part of the website list of "non-speak" responsibilities we find:

Preparation of Orders-in-Council and other statutory instruments to give effect to Government decisions

The PCO basically writes the Statutes and Acts that the legislators devise ensuring that they are correctly written to protect the monarch.

Order-in-council, at the federal level, is an order of the GOVERNOR GENERAL by and with the advice and consent of the Queen's PRIVY COUNCIL for Canada.

Have you noticed yet that more statutes does not equate with more freedom for the people? In fact, every new statute represents the gradual erosion, the camel's nose, of our freedoms and a means of taking our property through new infractions.

These statutes are very carefully worded, by the members of the Privy Council to conceal from the people, using legalese, what is actually being said.

Case in point is the legal term "includes" which represents the linchpin1 of statute 'law.'

The Interpretation Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. I-21), the act which defines the words in all other acts (unless they are not more specically defined in that act) reads:

person, or any word or expression descriptive of a person, includes a corporation; (underline mine)

The Legislation Act, 2006, S.O. 2006, c. 21, Sched. F for Ontario reads:

personincludes a corporation; (underline mine)

Everything—our life, freedoms, rights, and property—hinges on the meaning of this legal term!!!

If it was really meant to mean "also includes" why would they not have written that? If it means "also includes" then there is literally no limit to what can be includes in the term "person."

We refer to a particular dog or cat having its own personality. Can it be included? We are now faced with robots or androids. Will they be included?

In fact the term "includes" is a limiting term secretly, specifically, selected and defined by the Privy Council et al., to confuse and deceive the people into surrendering their rights and property through courts the judges of which are either also deceived of complicit in the deception.

Although morally and ethically unlawful but not legally since we consent out of our silence and ignorance.

In statute 'law' person always means a corporation, not man or woman.

Time to do away with the "secret" as well as the lie that they are all working for you—they are all working for "Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second". 



Footnotes:

1. "something that holds the various elements of a complicated structure together" Random House Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2017.

Use what you read here as a part of your research to establish your understanding.
Your actions remain your responsibility.
All natural rights reserved. © 2012 steven, a man. <><